Peter O’Neill’s arguments do not stand scrutiny
This document is part of the source library for NRGI's 2017 Resource Governance Index,
a comprehensive measure of the quality of
natural resource governance in oil, gas and mineral-rich
countries. To access the full dataset and all other index resources,
visit https://resourcegovernanceindex.org.
Data and Resources
Additional Info
Field | Value |
---|---|
Sector | Mining |
Country | Papua New Guinea |
Year | 2016 |
RGI Edition Year | 2017 |
Topic | Beneficial ownership |
Document Type | Newspaper Article |
RGI Sub-component | Licensing |
RGI Questions | 1.1.8a: From 2015 onwards, have senior public officials publicly disclosed their financial holdings in extractive companies? |
Did this document contribute to RGI scoring? | Used for scoring |
Are the RGI questions here tagged with law and/or practice | Practice |
Publisher | PNGExposed |
Author | Dilu Goma |
Source or API link | https://pngexposed.wordpress.com/2016/06/03/peter-oneills-arguments-do-not-stand-scrutiny/ |
Maintainer | Natural Resource Governance Institute |
Maintainer Email | Natural Resource Governance Institute |