Peter O’Neill’s arguments do not stand scrutiny

This document is part of the source library for NRGI's 2017 Resource Governance Index, a comprehensive measure of the quality of natural resource governance in oil, gas and mineral-rich countries. To access the full dataset and all other index resources, visit https://resourcegovernanceindex.org.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Sector Mining
Country Papua New Guinea
Year 2016
RGI Edition Year 2017
Topic Beneficial ownership
Document Type Newspaper Article
RGI Sub-component Licensing
RGI Questions 1.1.8a: From 2015 onwards, have senior public officials publicly disclosed their financial holdings in extractive companies?
Did this document contribute to RGI scoring? Used for scoring
Are the RGI questions here tagged with law and/or practice Practice
Publisher PNGExposed
Author Dilu Goma
Source or API link https://pngexposed.wordpress.com/2016/06/03/peter-oneills-arguments-do-not-stand-scrutiny/
Maintainer Natural Resource Governance Institute
Maintainer Email Natural Resource Governance Institute