Royalties for the Regions Progress Report 2013-14

This document is part of the source library for NRGI's 2017 Resource Governance Index, a comprehensive measure of the quality of natural resource governance in oil, gas and mineral-rich countries. To access the full dataset and all other index resources, visit https://resourcegovernanceindex.org.

Data and Resources

Royalties for the Regions Progress Report 2013-14PDF
- Preview
- Download

Additional Info

Field	Value
Sector	Mining
Country	Australia
Year	2014
RGI Edition Year	2017
Topic	Legislation and regulation, Open data, Revenue management, Revenue sharing, Sovereign wealth funds, Subnational governance
Document Type	Report
RGI Sub-component	Sovereign wealth funds
RGI Questions	2.2b: Are there specific rules governing the transfer of extractive resource revenues (i.e. are these rules distinct from those governing other types of transfers)?, 2.2c: Do rules specify that subnational governments of producing areas should receive a higher share of extractive resource revenues than those of non-producing areas?, 2.3.1a: Are there numeric rules governing the size of withdrawals from the sovereign wealth fund?, 2.3.1b: Do rules require that withdrawals and spending from the sovereign wealth fund pass through the national budget?, 2.3.4c: Does the sovereign wealth fund's most recent publicly available annual financial report specify the fund's asset allocation by asset class?, 2.3.6c: From 2015 onwards, has the legislature reviewed the sovereign wealth fund's annual financial reports?
Did this document contribute to RGI scoring?	Used for scoring
Are the RGI questions here tagged with law and/or practice	Law and Practice (Both)
Publisher	Western Australia Government
Author	Department of Regional Development
Source or API link	http://www.drd.wa.gov.au/Publications/Documents/Royalties_for_Regions_Progress_report_%202013-14.pdf
Maintainer	Natural Resource Governance Institute
Maintainer Email	Natural Resource Governance Institute