Fiscal Federalism of Non-Renewable Natural Resources: Principles and Practices of Revenue Sharing and Equalization

This document is part of the source library for NRGI's 2017 Resource Governance Index, a comprehensive measure of the quality of natural resource governance in oil, gas and mineral-rich countries. To access the full dataset and all other index resources, visit https://resourcegovernanceindex.org.

Data and Resources

Additional Info

Field Value
Sector Mining
Country South Africa
Year 2008
RGI Edition Year 2017
Topic Revenue management, Revenue sharing, Subnational governance
Document Type Journal
RGI Sub-component Open data
RGI Questions 2.2b: Are there specific rules governing the transfer of extractive resource revenues (i.e. are these rules distinct from those governing other types of transfers)?,
2.2c: Do rules specify that subnational governments of producing areas should receive a higher share of extractive resource revenues than those of non-producing areas?,
2.2.5a: Were transfers of extractive resource revenues to subnational governments externally audited over the most recently completed audit timeframe?
Did this document contribute to RGI scoring? Used for scoring
Are the RGI questions here tagged with law and/or practice Practice
Publisher Research Gate
Author Baoyun Qiao
Source or API link https://www.researchgate.net/publication/282877365_Fiscal_Federalism_of_Non-Renewable_Natural_Resources_Principles_and_Practices_of_Revenue_Sharing_and_Equalization
Maintainer Natural Resource Governance Institute
Maintainer Email Natural Resource Governance Institute